Skip to main content

tv   [untitled]    July 26, 2011 4:00pm-4:30pm PDT

4:00 pm
4:01 pm
4:02 pm
4:03 pm
4:04 pm
4:05 pm
4:06 pm
4:07 pm
4:08 pm
4:09 pm
4:10 pm
4:11 pm
4:12 pm
4:13 pm
4:14 pm
4:15 pm
4:16 pm
4:17 pm
4:18 pm
4:19 pm
4:20 pm
4:21 pm
4:22 pm
[gavel] president chiu: welcome back. at i understand and supervisor mar has some revisions for item 29. supervisor mar: the first two
4:23 pm
amendments are unchanged, and for the hiring, the only change is on page 5, line 11 to 14. a section on first source local hiring hit, and it should read, "local hiring/first tiring, to the extent permitted by law, to the extent allowed, they will permit local hiring for jobs created by these programs, perrot, and will work celebrity -- collaboratively." those are my non substantive amendments. president chiu: this is seconded by supervisor avalos. without objection, we will amend the one as opposed, and unless there is discussion, we will take a roll-call vote on items 28 and 29.
4:24 pm
clerk calvillo: supervisor chu, supervisor kim abscent, supervisor mirkarimi, supervisor wiener, supervisor alioto-pier -- supervisor avalos, supervisor chiu, supervisor kim. president chiu: let's go to item 32. clerk calvillo: item number 32, the settlement involving the
4:25 pm
lawsuit against t-mobile's. -- the lawsuit concerning t- mobile's. -- t-mobil. president chiu: this is passed on first reading. item number 33. clerk calvillo: item 33, the settlement of a claim with shatese stewart. president chiu: same house and call. next item. clerk caliv -- calvillo: item number 34, the cinema of a lawsuit concerning -- the settlement of a lawsuit concerning jorei enterprises.
4:26 pm
president chiu: supervisor maxwell -- supervisor avalos? supervisor avalos: i would like to amend the item 32. president chiu: colleagues? that vote is amended. supervisor avalos: ? i believe the conditional use ordinance that is governing how are facilities are sited should be tried. if we were to do the settlement, that creating a precedent, that ordnance made ineffective, and in the future, there will be a process that will be created through the process of the settlement. i think we will not provide the
4:27 pm
intent that was governing how we would decide our facilities, so i will be voting no. president chiu: supervisor campos? supervisor campos: i understand why this was put forward and can see the reasons behind it. i do worry about the precedent that the sec, and for those reasons, i will be voting against it -- why i do worry about the precedent that this sets. president chiu: why do we not take a roll call? clerk calvillo: supervisor chu, supervisor cohen, supervisor kim, supervisor mirkarimi, supervisor wiener, supervisor
4:28 pm
avalos, supervisor chiu. president chiu: this item passes. item number 35. clerk calvillo: item 35, the settlement of a lawsuit with arash ghanadan. president chiu: roll call. clerk calvillo: [reading roll] there are 11 ayes. president chiu: this ordinance is passed on the first reading. item number 36. clerk calvillo: item number 36,
4:29 pm
the settlement of a claim with weintraub capital management, a claim filed on january 25, 2011. president chiu: same house, same call? this is passed. next item. clerk calvillo: item 37, the settlement of an unmitigated claim with ned bresnahan. president chiu: same house in col. next item. -- same house, same call. next item. president chiu: next item. clerk cal; -- cal; -- ca